Last week Mitt Romney gave his Kennedy speech where he addressed the relevance of his Mormon faith to his candidacy (transcript here). I thought about writing an extended review, but I guess I am too lazy for that so it will have to be bullet points instead.
- Romney said, “A person should not be elected because of his faith nor should he be rejected because of his faith.”
I assume he is saying that individual voters should not vote against candidates because of their religion since the Constitution already prohibits religious tests at the system level. I think a person's religion says something about the way that person thinks. I certainly wouldn't vote for a scientologist for example. - “Freedom requires religion just as religion requires freedom. ... Freedom and religion endure together, or perish alone.”
Romney lost the militant atheist vote here ;) - “Let me assure you that no authorities of my church, or of any other church for that matter, will ever exert influence on presidential decisions. Their authority is theirs, within the province of church affairs, and it ends where the affairs of the nation begin.”
This confused me because this is the very definition of secularism when he earlier said he was against secularism. - Romney needs the evangelical Christian vote to win the Republican nomination. He wants to be able to play to the faith crowd without bringing any specifics of his own faith into this. This is why I don't understand why he said “I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and the Savior of mankind”. If he feels this is an appropriate question for a candidate to answer, couldn't this lead to other questions that won't play so well with his target audience.
- And finally, if you've read the speech, you'll probably appreciate this spoof.
Comments
I think Huckabee is the only remotely convincing Christian type I've seen in a long time (re: presidential candidates). I don't think it says a lot for the "Evangelical Christian" population (whatever that means) that his religion hasn't raised more questions to date. I don't believe Mormons make any claim to be "just one more sect" of Christianity and one doesn't have to scrutinize too long before running into heresy?
They must all be swept away by his polished (though somewhat acid) handsomeness.
Posted by: Tara on Sunday, December 16, 2007
Just from my observation, there seem to be plenty of Mormons who want to be considered Christians. I've seen a few pop up in the comments for the blog of Touchstone Magazine - an ecumenical journal. I wouldn't be surprised if Mormonism becomes increasingly more mainstream and moderates some of their theology. I think they have already started that. The differences seem too fundamental. Richard John Neuhaus dealt with some of these issues related to Romney in an article.
Posted by: CJ on Monday, December 17, 2007
Hm. He (RJN) doesn't think we need to worry about Romney getting orders from his church but I still wonder. Their system seems too controlling to not be a problem. Unless Mormonism means as much to him as Christianity does to Hillary (or GWB, for that matter).
I would agree that Mormons have their work cut out for them if they want to be "mainstream".
Posted by: Tara on Tuesday, December 18, 2007